Comments
|
Comments: 350 | Prop Total: 11 | Avg: 0.03
|
|
| Photo | Video | News | Wall | |
|
|
(August 16, 2008 at 11:51)
(Below Threshold) show comment
i dont think it should be sold for that much with that spec.. and it is almost 3 years old. |
|
|
36's feel weak? there some of the strongest forks you can buy. and work consistantly. i'd stay on 36 mate |
|
|
u cant get 66's pushed.. only a few boxxers and pikes |
|
|
|
|
its shit mate. haha get some new tires though.. |
|
|
|
|
what happened to your fun wheels? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
203mm they just look so big because of the rearwards arch |
|
|
u know what seems silly, how all these pictures seem really perfect and set up |
|
|
he also dills holes in his pedals and frame with lightweight foam to keep mub out. looks like paint was also too heavy... |
|
|
|
|
street riding... haha and i only went to glasgow to buy pedals and tripped across this |
|
|
|
|
nah i got a through axel. this'll be fine mate. i hate quick release so i want something stronger |
|
|
are they not the cheaper ones you can buy new for around 300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is that clipless pedals on sam hills bike? wiiiiit... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats the "small" drop before the double road gap. still dought id even do that. haha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i want boxxers for it. cos i'm rather light. the frame is acctually klighter than the shocker.. which i didn't believe until i saw it on the website |
|
|
|
|
|
(August 16, 2008 at 11:51)
(Below Threshold) show comment